"Beyond the Chains of Tradition"
"Honor the past without worshipping it."
-Whalid Safodien
The Feather Pen
The Fallibility of Classical Islamic Scholars and the Crisis of
Modern Fatwas: A Critical Examination
By
Whalid Safodien
Introduction
The
classical scholars of Islam—men of towering intellect and devotion—laid the
foundations of Islamic jurisprudence, theology, and exegesis. Their
contributions are monumental, yet they were not infallible. Their
methodologies, though rigorous, were bound by the limitations of their time:
incomplete access to hadith, political pressures, theological biases, and the
inherent subjectivity of human reasoning. Today, their rulings are often
treated as sacrosanct, leading to a crisis in Islamic legal thought. Modern
muftis, shackled by uncritical adherence to these classical frameworks,
perpetuate errors, deepen sectarian divides, and issue fatwas that contradict
the essence of Islam. This essay explores the fallibility of classical
scholars, the dangers of rigid taqlid (blind following), the sectarian poison
spread by both Sunni and Shia scholars, and the psychological pathologies of
contemporary muftis who prioritize tradition over truth.
The Fallibility of Classical Scholars: A
Necessary Recognition
Classical
scholars—Imam Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafi’i, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and their Shia
counterparts like Al-Kulayni and Al-Majlisi—were products of their historical
and intellectual contexts. Their brilliance notwithstanding, their rulings were
shaped by:
1.
Limited Access to Hadith – Many relied on weak or even fabricated narrations due to
the absence of comprehensive hadith verification tools available today. Bukhari
and Muslim, despite their rigor, included hadiths later critiqued by scholars
like Al-Dhahabi and Ibn al-Jawzi.
2.
Political Influence – The Abbasid and Umayyad caliphs often pressured scholars
to legitimize state policies. Imam Abu Hanifa was imprisoned for resisting
tyranny, while others, knowingly or unknowingly, bent rulings to appease
rulers.
3.
Human Error in Ijtihad – Ijtihad (independent reasoning) is inherently
subjective. Qiyas (analogical deduction) led to rulings that, while logical in
their time, are now obsolete or even harmful (e.g., slavery rulings, gender
restrictions).
4.
Cultural Bias –
Many classical fatwas reflected the patriarchal and tribal norms of 7th-10th
century Arabia, not the universal spirit of the Qur’an.
To
treat their rulings as divine law is to commit intellectual idolatry.
The Crisis of Modern Muftis: When Taqlid
Becomes Tyranny
Modern
muftis, particularly in rigid madhhab traditions, commit three fatal errors:
1.
Outdated Chains of Narration – Many still rely on weak hadiths long debunked by
contemporary scholarship. For example, fatwas against women’s leadership often
cite the disputed hadith of Abu Bakra, ignoring stronger Qur’anic principles of
justice and merit.
2.
Psychological Dependence on Authority – Many muftis suffer from what
psychologists call "authority bias"—an irrational deference to
classical texts, fearing backlash if they challenge tradition. This creates a
feedback loop where error is perpetuated as orthodoxy.
3.
Legalistic Obsession Over Spirituality – Instead of fostering a connection with
Allah, modern fatwas focus on controlling behavior—banning music, enforcing
beard lengths, and policing women—while ignoring greater sins like corruption
and oppression.
Sectarianism: The Great Crime of Sunni and
Shia Scholars
Both
Sunni and Shia scholars have weaponized classical rulings to fuel division:
- Sunni
Extremism – Scholars like Ibn
Taymiyyah (though brilliant) laid the groundwork for takfir
(excommunication), later exploited by Wahhabi movements to justify
violence against Shias and Sufis.
- Shia
Victimhood Theology –
Shia scholars like Al-Majlisi propagated the cult of martyrdom and
exaggerated doctrines of imamate, creating an "us vs. them"
mentality that alienates Sunni Muslims.
The
result? A fractured ummah where theological disputes override Qur’anic unity.
Conclusion: A Call for Intellectual Courage
Islam
is a religion of reason, yet we have imprisoned it in the past. Classical
scholars were giants, but even giants err. Modern muftis must:
- Reject
weak hadiths and prioritize Qur’anic
principles.
- End
sectarian dogmatism and
focus on shared ethical values.
- Embrace
adaptive ijtihad to address contemporary
challenges (bioethics, finance, human rights).
The
Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The scholars are the inheritors of the
prophets." But inheritance
is not stagnation—it is growth. If we continue to chain Islam to medieval
rulings, we betray its dynamic spirit. Let us honor the past without
worshipping it. Let us think, question, and reform—before ignorance dressed as
tradition destroys us all.
—Whalid Safodien
Philospher / Author
Code Writer
Low level and High Level
